Author

Jean Claude Defrance

1743-1807

Jean Claude Defrance (1743-1807) is a public-domain author available on Rivro. Read free books, explore subjects, and discover related classics.

Wikipedia

Subjects

Books by Jean Claude Defrance

Opinion par Defrance, sur les postes et messageries: Séance du 28 Fructidor, an IV

"Opinion par Defrance, sur les postes et messageries: Séance du 28 Fructidor, an IV" is a legislative opinion piece likely written in the late 18th century during the period of the French Revolution. It presents a detailed analysis concerning the management of postal and messaging services in France. The document argues for the benefits of privatizing these services rather than maintaining them under direct governmental oversight. In this opinion, Defrance examines the inefficiencies and financial burdens induced by current state management of the postal services. He articulates the argument that the state has generally suffered from the mismanagement and corruption associated with such governance. Instead, he advocates for the privatization or "fferme" system, which is suggested to offer better economic returns for the state and ensure improved service quality. Defrance argues for a simplified administration structure, detailing proposals for daily transport of goods and faster communication to bolster commerce and public welfare. Ultimately, he calls for a commission to evaluate the issues of franchises and the potential for administrative reforms in this sector.

Opinion de Defrance, sur les postes et messageries: Séance du 16 Pluviôse, an V

"Opinion de Defrance, sur les postes et messageries: Séance du 16 Pluviôse, an V" is a legislative document authored by Defrance during the late 18th century, specifically during the period of the French Revolution. This book serves as a detailed analysis and proposal concerning the administration of postal and messaging services in France. It addresses the inefficiencies and financial struggles faced by these essential public services and discusses potential solutions. In the text, Defrance examines the various administrative systems for managing the postal services, comparing the current state of "régie" (government administration) to the concept of "ferme" (contracting out to private entities). He outlines the issues stemming from mismanagement, inefficiency, and financial deficits that have plagued the postal system. Through a structured argument, he advocates for the adoption of a mixed contract system known as "ferme intéressée," which he believes would optimize service efficiency and improve national revenue. The conclusion emphasizes the urgency of implementing these reforms to prevent complete disorganization and enhance the functionality of postal and messaging services critical for commerce and communication in the Republic.

Lettre de Defrance à Bion, sur sa réponse aux objections contre l'établissement de la régie intéressée des postes et messageries

"Lettre de Defrance à Bion, sur sa réponse aux objections contre l'établissement de la Régie intéressée des Postes et Messageries" by Defrance is a political treatise written in the late 18th century. The book presents a detailed argument against Bion's defense of a specific administrative system concerning France's postal and messaging services, shedding light on the complexities of governance and public finance during this transformative period in history. In this letter, Defrance engages directly with Bion, critiquing his reasoning and asserting the superiority of the "Ferme" system over the "Régie" that Bion defends. Defrance argues that the previous administration under the Régie has proven to be flawed and corrupt, citing the necessity for transparency and accountability in government finance. He draws historical parallels, invokes the principles of notable political writers like Montesquieu, and emphasizes the need for a financial administration that prioritizes public welfare over personal gain. Through this correspondence, Defrance articulates his views on governance, aiming to convince public officials of the potential pitfalls of the Régie system while advocating for a more responsible and fair approach to managing France’s postal service.