Author
A. V. (Albert Venn) Dicey
1835-1922
A. V. (Albert Venn) Dicey (1835-1922) is a public-domain author available on Rivro. Read free books, explore subjects, and discover related classics.
WikipediaSubjects
Books by A. V. (Albert Venn) Dicey
A Leap in the Dark A Criticism of the Principles of Home Rule as Illustrated by the Bill of 1893
"A Leap in the Dark" by A. V. Dicey is a critical examination of the principles underlying the Home Rule Bill of 1893, written in the late 19th century. The work argues that, despite being perceived as a measure for governing Ireland, this bill essentially introduces a new constitutional framework for the entire United Kingdom. Dicey contends that this transformation carries potential repercussions that could be disastrous for both England and Ireland, leading to a constitutional revolution instead of a resolution to long-standing controversies. The opening of the book sets the stage for a detailed critique of the Home Rule Bill, stating that it alters the relationship between the different regions of the United Kingdom fundamentally. Dicey emphasizes that the bill's passage would diminish the effective authority of the Imperial Parliament over Ireland, creating a de facto semi-federal structure that is untested and laden with risks. He argues that the bill, although framed as a pathway to Irish self-governance, may instead usher in significant instability and conflict, as the distinct rights and relationships between England and Ireland become contested under a new constitutional framework. His assessment warns that this "leap in the dark" is fraught with unknown consequences, and the balance of power may shift in ways that could unravel the unity of the kingdom itself.
England's Case Against Home Rule
"England's Case Against Home Rule" by A. V. Dicey is a political treatise written in the late 19th century that critically examines the notion of Home Rule for Ireland from an English perspective. The book focuses on the constitutional implications of granting Ireland parliamentary independence, arguing that it poses significant risks to the British Constitution and potentially undermines the stability of the United Kingdom. Dicey positions himself as an informed critic, drawing on his understanding of constitutional law rather than as a specialist on Irish affairs. The opening of this work presents Dicey's rationale for discussing Home Rule, emphasizing the potential constitutional changes it would necessitate and the impact such changes could have on British interests. He outlines his aims to analyze the arguments for Home Rule and to argue that it could be as damaging to England as the complete separation of Ireland would be. He emphasizes a need for impartiality in discussing what he believes is a complex and deeply divisive issue, acknowledging that the feelings and historical grievances surrounding the Irish question complicate rational debate. The beginning establishes the intellectual framework for Dicey's argument, which he aims to explore in detail throughout the text.