Curated shelf
Current History
Browse Current History as a public-domain reading list on Rivro, with free classics, authors, subjects, and related books.
Current History, Vol. VIII, No. 3, June 1918 A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times
Various
Current History, Vol. VIII, No. 3, June 1918 A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times
"Current History, Vol. VIII, No. 3, June 1918" by Various is a historical magazine publication written in the early 20th century. It details contemporary events during World War I, focusing on military, political, and social aspects of the time, particularly battles and strategies on the Western Front. The content includes reports from correspondents and analyses of combat situations, reflecting the experiences and sacrifices of soldiers during this tumultuous period. The opening of this volume provides a snapshot of the wartime situation as of May 1918, highlighting the comparative calm on the Western Front after intense fighting. It outlines crucial military movements and engagements, such as the battles in Picardy and Flanders, the arrival of American troops in France, and the relentless German attempts to breach Allied lines. Additionally, it discusses key political developments, including the renewal of alliances between Germany and Austria and the significant impact of American labor missions in Europe, painting a comprehensive and dynamic picture of life and conflict during World War I.
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 1, No. 1 From the Beginning to March, 1915, With Index
Various
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 1, No. 1 From the Beginning to March, 1915, With Index
"New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 1, No. 1" by Various is a historical account produced during the early 20th century, specifically amid the early months of the First World War. The work compiles various essays and opinions from notable authors and intellectuals who reflect on the war's causes, implications, and the political landscape of Europe at the time, providing a multifaceted perspective on the unfolding conflict. The opening of the publication introduces George Bernard Shaw's article "Common Sense About the War," where he expresses his views on the war's nature and its roots in nationalism and militarism. Shaw argues against the narrative of a united front against a common enemy, highlighting the manipulation of public sentiment by ruling classes in both England and Germany. He critiques the idea of militarism and emphasizes the danger of propaganda that fuels conflict between nations, suggesting that the struggle is not just between countries but also reflective of internal class struggles and power dynamics. This thought-provoking commentary sets a critical tone for the discussions throughout the volume.
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2 Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2 Who Began the War, and Why?
"New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March…" is a historical account likely written in the early 20th century. This publication provides an extensive examination of the events leading to World War I, focusing on the roles of various nations and their justifications for entering the conflict. The text appears to include speeches, declarations, and analyses that represent multiple viewpoints, particularly emphasizing the perspectives of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and their adversaries. The opening of the work sets the stage for a thorough discussion of the war, starting with a noticeable inquiry about its origins: “Who began the war, and why?”. It appears to introduce a series of speeches from key figures, including Kaiser Wilhelm II and other prominent leaders, outlining their reasons for war and depicting a defensive posture against perceived aggressors. The initial arguments articulate the tense political climate of the time, with Germany and Austria-Hungary seeking to justify their military actions against the backdrop of rising nationalism and political intrigue in Europe, effectively laying the groundwork for the complex narrative that would unfold in the chapters to come.
The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine The European War, March 1915
Various
The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine The European War, March 1915
"The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine" by Various is a periodical publication focusing on historical events written during the early 20th century. This particular issue centers on the European War, specifically delving into the Balkan conflicts that led up to and unfolded during World War I. The magazine aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the situation from various perspectives, highlighting how these regional tensions contributed to the broader context of the war. The opening of this issue sets the stage for an in-depth examination of the Balkans, detailing the interactions and declarations from key players like Turkey and Serbia as they navigated growing hostilities. It reveals Turkey's initial stance of neutrality amidst rising tensions, outlines the chaotic environment in Constantinople, and describes the efforts of the Ottoman Empire to align with potential allies while remaining watchful of the unfolding conflict. The narrative emphasizes the complexity of regional politics, the aspirations of the Balkan states, and the immediate impact of the European War on their societies, making clear that the historical backdrop is pivotal to understanding the larger war dynamics.
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915 April-September, 1915
Various
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915 April-September, 1915
"New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 4, July, 1915" is a historical account published in the early 20th century. This particular volume focuses on the events surrounding World War I, particularly the controversies involving the sinking of the Lusitania, diplomatic relations between the United States and Germany, and the resignation of Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan. The text is likely aimed at providing readers with a detailed perspective on the political and military developments of the war as they unfolded. The opening of this volume presents a range of articles and dispatches detailing crucial moments from June 1915, with a strong emphasis on the Lusitania case and the subsequent diplomatic fallout between the U.S. and Germany. The text begins with an introduction to the situation, including President Wilson's replies to German communications concerning the Lusitania disaster, which resulted in the deaths of many Americans. Additionally, the text addresses Bryan's resignation due to differing views on how to handle the escalating conflict, highlighting the tension between diplomatic approaches favoring peace versus those calling for more aggressive stances amid a backdrop of burgeoning war sentiment. Overall, the beginning sets the stage for a complex interplay of international relations during a pivotal moment in history.
Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2
Various
Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2
"Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918" by Various is a monthly periodical written during the early 20th century. This publication offers detailed accounts and analyses of significant wartime events, particularly focusing on World War I, and provides a contemporary perspective on pivotal military actions and political developments. The opening of this magazine sets the stage for one of the most intense periods of World War I, particularly highlighting the ongoing Battle of Picardy that began on March 21, 1918. It describes the scale of military engagement, noting that around four million soldiers were involved in fierce combat, with General Foch appointed as Commander in Chief of the Allied forces in response to the German offensive. The text also covers other critical topics, including the shifting political landscape due to Austria’s attempts at a separate peace with France, the participation of American forces, and the impact of conscription on British policy regarding Ireland, painting a vivid picture of the complexities and challenges faced by the Allies during this tumultuous time.
The New York Times Current History: the European War, February, 1915
Various
The New York Times Current History: the European War, February, 1915
"The New York Times Current History: The European War, February, 1915" by Various is a historical account published during the early 20th century. This work serves as an in-depth compilation of contemporary writings and opinions regarding the European conflict, particularly focusing on World War I and its societal and cultural repercussions. The collection likely highlights the perspectives from various authors, intellectuals, and military figures on the war's impact and the nature of patriotism and identity amid turmoil. The opening portion introduces a profound and emotionally charged appeal from Russian authors, artists, and intellectuals, urging their fellow citizens to recognize the brutality inflicted by Germany during the war. They evoke vivid imagery of destruction and suffering, calling for unity and a collective response to the atrocities being committed. This initial appeal sets the tone for a broader discourse on national pride, identity, and the moral responsibilities of nations at war. The text emphasizes the necessity for a united front against perceived barbarism and reflects a deep engagement with the cultural and ethical implications of the conflict.
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
Various
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
"New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915" is a historical account written during the early 20th century. This publication provides a detailed analysis of the European conflict during World War I, focusing specifically on the war's implications for American interests and international law. The central topic revolves around the complexities and consequences of submarine warfare, particularly the infamous Lusitania case and its aftermath, concerning the rights of neutral nations. At the start of this volume, the focus is on the diplomatic interactions between the United States and Germany following the sinking of the Lusitania, which resulted in the loss of American lives. The narrative outlines the events leading up to the American government's protest against Germany's submarine warfare tactics and the subsequent diplomatic exchanges between the two nations. Moreover, it delves into American sentiments, press reactions, and the overarching questions of international law and neutral rights during wartime, setting the stage for discussions about military strategy and international relations that define the ongoing war.
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 2, No. 1, April, 1915 April-September, 1915
Various
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 2, No. 1, April, 1915 April-September, 1915
"New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol 2, No. 1, April, 1915" is a historical account published in the early 20th century. The work serves as a monthly magazine issue detailing events and discussions surrounding the European War during World War I. It covers various topics, including military strategies, political responses, and personal reflections from global leaders and thinkers at the time. The opening of this volume presents a series of communications and exchanges between the German and American governments in response to Germany's declaration of a naval war zone around Great Britain. It details the German government's justification for targeting enemy and neutral vessels, the U.S. government's protests regarding the potential endangerment of American lives and ships, and Great Britain's thoughts on the misuse of neutral flags by merchant vessels. This segment foreshadows the escalating tensions and complexities of international relations during wartime, highlighting issues of sovereignty, maritime law, and the balancing act between military necessity and humanitarian concerns.
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915
Various
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915
"The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January…" is a historical account written during the early 20th century. This publication focuses on the events and battles of World War I, particularly through the lens of official military dispatches and reports. Likely intended for a contemporary audience seeking insights into the war's developments, it provides detailed analyses of military strategies, troop movements, and significant battles involving the British forces. The opening of the book presents a dispatch from Field Marshal Sir John French, detailing the proceedings of the British forces in the early stages of World War I, particularly around the Battle of Mons and the subsequent retreat. French meticulously recounts the logistics of troop transportation, the military operations undertaken by his forces, and the challenges they faced against artillery and infantry of the German army. The text also emphasizes the bravery of British soldiers during their engagements, the impact of weather conditions on operations, and the strategic decisions made in response to evolving battlefield scenarios. This detailed account sets the stage for understanding the complexities and realities of military leadership in wartime.
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 3, June, 1915 April-September, 1915
Various
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 3, June, 1915 April-September, 1915
"New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 3, June, 1915" is a historical account published during the early 20th century. This volume focuses on pivotal events during World War I, particularly examining the Lusitania disaster and its aftermath, along with Germany's justification and the subsequent diplomatic responses from the United States. It captures the tense atmosphere of the time, exploring themes of warfare, the impact of submarine tactics, and international relations. The opening of the publication sets the stage for a detailed analysis of the Lusitania case, which involved the tragic sinking of the British passenger ship by a German submarine, leading to significant loss of American lives. It recounts President Wilson's measured response to this act and provides a series of documents, testimonies, and reports that collectively depict the chaos, human cost, and political ramifications surrounding the event. The narrative emphasizes the conflicting justifications from both American and German perspectives regarding accountability for the deaths and the broader implications for neutral shipping during wartime.
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 2, May, 1915 April-September, 1915
Various
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 2, May, 1915 April-September, 1915
"The New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 2, May, 1915" is a historical account written during the early 20th century. The publication serves as a monthly magazine documenting the events and narratives related to World War I, specifically detailing various battles, military reports, and political perspectives of the time. This volume includes significant accounts such as the battle at Neuve Chapelle, the surrender of the fortress of Przemysl, and insights into the Dardanelles campaign, revealing the intense human and strategic realities of wartime. At the start of this volume, the publication presents a report from General Sir John French on the costly victory at Neuve Chapelle, detailing the British casualties sustained during the battle and the strategic maneuvers involved. The narrative continues with an account of the surrendered fortress of Przemysl, elaborating on the siege’s impact on the war and the morale of both the Russians and the Austrians involved. Additionally, the opening portion of the magazine features various poems and essays that reflect the sentiments and thoughts surrounding the ongoing war, providing both factual and emotional context to the unfolding global conflict.
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe
Various
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe
"The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915" is a historical account written during the early 20th century. The work offers a detailed examination of the complex political landscape surrounding the outbreak of World War I, particularly focusing on the ethical and legal justifications presented by various nations involved in the conflict. The book compiles various articles, discussions, and analyses regarding key events, including the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the subsequent reactions of Austria-Hungary, Serbia, and their allies, providing a snapshot of public opinion and diplomatic reasoning at the time. The opening of this volume sets the stage for a legal and moral analysis of the war's origins, notably through a critical article by James M. Beck. He poses hypothetical scenarios to evaluate the conduct of the nations involved, arguing for an international moral standard amidst the chaos of war. Beck systematically questions the justification of Austria-Hungary's aggression against Serbia following the assassination, while also analyzing Germany's role in supporting Austria. He contemplates the implications of treaty violations, the concept of sovereign rights, and challenges the prevailing narratives of guilt and innocence among the powers involved, suggesting that a peaceful resolution was possible had diplomatic channels been utilized effectively. This opening provides a thought-provoking exploration of the ethical dilemmas associated with war and the intricacies of international relations in a time of crisis.