Subject

Baptism -- Law and legislation -- England -- History -- 19th century Books

Best books

Edward Hall Alderson

A Second Letter to the Bishop of Exeter

"A Second Letter to the Bishop of Exeter" by Sir Edward Hall Alderson is a theological treatise addressing ecclesiastical jurisdiction and governance within the Church of England, written during the mid-19th century. The book delves into the implications of the Privy Council's judgment in the Gorham Case, emphasizing the relationship between the Crown and the Church, and the authority of bishops in the ecclesiastical hierarchy. In this letter, the author attempts to clarify the nature of the Duplex Querela and its significance within ecclesiastical law. Alderson discusses the jurisdictional powers of the Archbishop of Canterbury and argues against the notion that any ecclesiastical rule has been violated by the Crown's involvement in church matters. He explores the concept of Royal Supremacy, indicating that while the Crown holds significant authority, it does not extend to interfering with the core spiritual functions of the Church. Instead, he advocates for a collaborative relationship between the secular government and the Church, suggesting that the legislative powers should be exercised with input from Convocation to ensure the Church’s integrity and function properly within the state framework.

Edward Hall Alderson

A Letter to the Bishop of Exeter

"A Letter to the Bishop of Exeter" by Sir Edward Hall Alderson is a philosophical and theological treatise written in the mid-19th century. This book is framed as a letter and delves into the implications of a decision made by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council regarding church doctrine, specifically relating to the opinions of a clergyman named Mr. Gorham on the nature of baptism and regeneration. The text aims to clarify the nuances of legal rulings in the context of church governance and to argue that these decisions should not excessively alarm church members. In the letter, Alderson elaborates on his belief that the decision made regarding discontent with Mr. Gorham's opinions does not necessarily undermine the future prospects of the Church of England. He articulates that while he finds the decision erroneous, it is merely a judgment rather than a legally binding law, suggesting that future cases can correct this error. Alderson evaluates Gorham's articulated views on baptism, arguing that they do not violate existing church doctrine. He concludes by encouraging adherence to the Church and fostering a more profound commitment amidst challenges to established beliefs, advocating for clarity and confidence in the church's teachings.

Recently surfaced classics