Subject
Jesus Christ -- Resurrection Books
Best books
Charles R. (Charles Robert) Morrison
The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint
"The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint" by Charles R. Morrison is a theological treatise written in the late 19th century. The book discusses the historical evidence and arguments concerning the resurrection of Jesus Christ, presenting the case from the perspective of legal evidence. Primarily addressing the authenticity of the New Testament writings, it aims to provide a reliable examination of their implications regarding Christ's claims as a divine figure. At the start of the treatise, Morrison establishes the significance of Christ's resurrection as a pivotal question in Christianity, emphasizing its relevance for believers and skeptics alike. He introduces the necessity for rigorous inquiry into the evidence surrounding this miracle and critiques the assumptions of those who deny the possibility of miracles. Morrison intends to use principles of law to analyze historical claims and will reference the works of early Christian figures such as Justin Martyr and Papias, setting the stage for a detailed examination of the sources of evidence he plans to present in succeeding chapters.
Thomas Sherlock
Trial of the Witnesses of the Resurrection of Jesus
"Trial of the Witnesses of the Resurrection of Jesus" by Thomas Sherlock is a theological discourse likely written in the early 18th century. The work engages in a critical examination of the evidence surrounding the resurrection of Jesus, specifically addressing the arguments presented by an opponent named Woolston, who questioned the validity of Christ's miracles and resurrection. Sherlock organizes his inquiry in a trial format, presenting a debate on whether the legal and logical grounds of evidence support the resurrection claim. At the start of the work, a group of gentlemen, who are all familiar with one another, discusses Woolston's recent trial and subsequent arguments against the miracles attributed to Jesus. This conversation organically evolves into a formal debate, with one participant agreeing to defend the evidence for the resurrection against the objections raised by Woolston. The mood is light-hearted at first, but as the discourse unfolds, it becomes a serious examination of both the nature of evidence and the historical claims surrounding Jesus's resurrection. The gentlemen explore various objections and defences, leading to greater deliberations on what constitutes valid evidence, ultimately setting the stage for a rigorous engagement with the opposing viewpoints regarding this foundational aspect of Christian theology.
Recently surfaced classics