Subject
Mental efficiency Books
Best books
Émile Faguet
The cult of incompetence
"The Cult of Incompetence" by Émile Faguet is a critical examination of modern democracy, likely written in the early 20th century. Through his insights, Faguet argues that contemporary democratic systems worship and promote incompetence, specifically in governance and the selection of leaders. He explores the detrimental effects of this preference on society, government, and the law, suggesting that a more competent and informed leadership is essential for effective governance. The opening of the book begins with an introduction that sets the stage for Faguet's argument by discussing historical frameworks of governance and the importance of principles in various government forms. It transitions into a critical overview of how democracies tend to elevate the incompetent, illustrated through historical examples and philosophical reflection. Faguet contends that this trend leads to a lack of specialization and a decline in governmental effectiveness, as the populace fails to appreciate the necessity of qualified leaders, resulting in chaotic and ineffective legislation driven by popular passion rather than wisdom or reason. Overall, the opening portion establishes a thought-provoking foundation for the arguments and critiques that will unfold throughout the entire text.
Arnold Bennett
Mental Efficiency, and Other Hints to Men and Women
"Mental Efficiency, and Other Hints to Men and Women" by Arnold Bennett is a self-help book written in the early 20th century. The text explores the concept of mental efficiency, contrasting it with the widespread emphasis on physical efficiency in society. Bennett aims to provide insights into cultivating mental effectiveness and promoting personal development, encouraging readers to harness their mental potential to improve their quality of life. At the start of the book, Bennett outlines an appeal to his readers, acknowledging a general concern about mental inefficiency as people pursue physical excellence. He reflects on the lack of attention given to cultivating the mind, addressing common regrets among individuals who feel their mental faculties are underutilized. In a thought-provoking manner, Bennett invites a dialogue with his audience, asking for their experiences and perspectives on mental efficiency. The opening portion sets the tone for a broader discussion on enhancing one's mental abilities and suggests practical steps for achieving personal growth and fulfillment.
Émile Faguet
A kontárság kultusza
"A kontárság kultusza" by Émile Faguet is a critical sociopolitical treatise written in the early 20th century. The text addresses the prevalent ideologies influencing the political and social landscapes of modern democracies, especially focusing on the pitfalls of incompetence and demagoguery. Faguet critiques the excesses of democracy and the cultural shift towards incompetence that he observes in political institutions. The opening of the book introduces Faguet's examination of political governance, positing that various forms of government, such as monarchy and democracy, each have foundational principles that can lead to their decline when overstretched or abandoned. He discusses the dangers associated with modern democracy, illustrating how it fosters a disregard for expertise and promotes an environment that prioritizes popular sentiment over competence. By drawing on historical references and contemporary examples, Faguet outlines his argument that the essence of democracy, while seemingly inclusive, can create a system where incompetence flourishes, ultimately threatening the integrity of governance itself.
Émile Faguet
Le culte de l'incompétence
"Le culte de l'incompétence" by Émile Faguet is a political essay written in the early 20th century. It argues that mass democracies, intent on equality and direct control, displace specialized competence with passion-driven representation, leading parliaments to govern, administer, and legislate poorly. The work contrasts this drift with an ideal of informed, moderate, and detached lawmaking and warns of a polity that politicizes every function and churns out reactive, short-lived laws. The opening of the essay situates the book within a contemporary studies series, then revisits Montesquieu’s idea that each regime has a guiding principle to claim that democracy’s is the worship of incompetence. Faguet illustrates how popular sovereignty erodes specialization: Athens replaced trained judges with paid jurors; modern democracies evolved from filtered elections to direct representation that rewards passion over expertise, producing “politicians” dependent on the crowd. He shows the legislature usurping executive and administrative roles, dictating appointments and decisions, distrusting inamovibility, and turning governance into partisan oversight, while genuine competence retreats to private professions that the state seeks to nationalize; even socialism, he argues, would slide toward despotism. He then sketches the truly competent legislator—well informed about a people’s temperament, moderate, and free of passion—favoring insinuation over command and prudence in changing laws, before concluding that democracy instead elects impassioned, uninformed lawmakers who pass episodic, event-driven measures like a daily newspaper.
Recently surfaced classics