Subject
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Authorship -- Baconian theory Books
Best books
Appleton Morgan
The Shakespearean Myth: William Shakespeare and Circumstantial Evidence
"The Shakespearean Myth: William Shakespeare and Circumstantial Evidence" by Appleton Morgan is a historical account written in the late 19th century. The work delves into the controversies surrounding the authorship of the plays attributed to William Shakespeare, arguing that there are significant gaps in evidence regarding his role as their sole creator. Morgan explores the notion that the legacy of the Stratford-born playwright may not be as straightforward or singular as traditionally believed. The opening of the text establishes the premise that, while Shakespeare is celebrated as a literary genius, the circumstances of his life raise questions about whether he could have authored the works attributed to him. Morgan discusses the lack of contemporary documentation supporting Shakespeare's authorship and highlights contrasting accounts of his life, which portray him as a mere actor and theater manager rather than a profound author. He suggests that the evidence typically cited in favor of Shakespeare’s literary status is insufficient and challenges readers to reconsider the historical narrative surrounding such an iconic figure.
Mark Twain
Is Shakespeare Dead? From My Autobiography
"Is Shakespeare Dead?" by Mark Twain is a reflective and satirical treatise on the authorship of Shakespeare’s works, written during the early 20th century. In this work, Twain grapples with long-standing debates over who truly wrote the plays attributed to Shakespeare, questioning the historical record and delving into the inconsistencies surrounding the poet's life. The narrative combines Twain's autobiographical anecdotes with a sharp critique of literary pretensions and the human tendency to believe in grand claims without substantial evidence. The opening of the book introduces Twain's perspective on the elusive nature of historical truths, particularly regarding Shakespeare. He shares recollections of discussions with a passionate pilot named Ealer, who held firm beliefs about Shakespeare's authorship, which Twain initially supported. However, as the dialogue progresses, Twain's skepticism grows, leading him to adopt a more nuanced stance. He reflects on the contradictions in Shakespeare's background and the scant evidence of his literary genius, positing that the legendary figure may not have penned such profound works. This mix of humor and critique sets the stage for Twain's examination of the broader implications of literary legends and the nature of belief itself.
Elizabeth Wells Gallup
Concerning the bi-literal cypher of Francis Bacon discovered in his works
"Concerning the Bi-literal Cypher of Francis Bacon Discovered in His Works" by Elizabeth Wells Gallup is a historical analysis written in the late 19th century. This book explores the existence of a secret decoding system, known as the Bi-literal Cypher, allegedly conceived by Francis Bacon, which purportedly lies hidden within his literary works. It discusses the cipher's implications on the historical narrative concerning Queen Elizabeth I and claims to uncover hidden truths about Bacon's life and authorship of various works attributed to other writers of the Elizabethan era. The opening of this work introduces the author's intentions and initial findings related to Bacon's cipher method. Gallup reveals that her research led her to discover hidden histories about significant historical figures, including the assertion that Bacon may be the illegitimate son of Elizabeth I. Additionally, she describes the cumbersome journey of deciphering various texts and the meticulous nature of her work, which aims to unveil intricate literary mysteries. The narrative sets the stage for a detailed examination of both a cipher system and the historical context that surrounds it, promising an intriguing read for those interested in cryptography and historical literature.
Andrew Lang
Shakespeare, Bacon, and the Great Unknown
"Shakespeare, Bacon, and the Great Unknown" by Andrew Lang is a scholarly work exploring the contentious debate surrounding the authorship of William Shakespeare's plays, written in the early 20th century. The text delves into theories that suggest Francis Bacon, or some other unknown individual, rather than the traditional Stratford man, authored the works attributed to Shakespeare. Lang's exploration addresses the divide between Baconians, who advocate for Bacon's authorship, and those who defend Shakespeare's legacy, highlighting various historical perspectives and arguments on both sides. The opening of this book establishes the context for a detailed inquiry into the long-standing controversy regarding Shakespeare's authorship. Lang presents the theories posited by his contemporaries, notably Mr. G. G. Greenwood, who categorically dismisses Shakespeare as the true author and seeks to propose an anonymous literary genius as a more plausible creator. Throughout the introduction and first chapter, Lang outlines the fundamental positions held by Baconians versus Stratfordians, revealing the lack of consensus even among the critics and literary scholars. As such, the beginning effectively sets the stage for further exploration of these debates throughout the rest of the text, offering readers a glimpse into the complicated interplay of evidence, speculation, and literary loyalty that surrounds one of history's most beloved playwrights.
William T. (William Thomas) Smedley
The Mystery of Francis Bacon
"The Mystery of Francis Bacon" by William T. Smedley is a historical account written in the early 20th century. The book delves into the complexities surrounding the life of Francis Bacon, a renowned philosopher and statesman, focusing particularly on the controversies and mysteries that shroud his legacy. Smedley appears intent on unpacking the tensions between Bacon's high intellectual achievements and his later reputation as a corrupt official. The opening of the work presents a preface that raises questions about the perceived moral failings of Bacon compared to his immense contributions to philosophy and literature. Smedley notes how history has often vilified Bacon, despite the reverence he commanded from his contemporaries. The author outlines the intention to explore lesser-known aspects of Bacon's life and work, emphasizing that much about his early years and literary activities remains obscure. Smedley aims to investigate the possibility that Bacon hid his authorial identity, suggesting that this may unlock further understanding of his contributions to both literature and philosophy.
Delia Salter Bacon
The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded
"The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded" by Delia Salter Bacon is a philosophical examination of the works attributed to William Shakespeare, written during the mid-19th century. The text aims to uncover a hidden philosophical system underlying Shakespeare's plays, suggesting that they reflect a deeper intellectual tradition shared with contemporaries like Lord Bacon. The opening of this work introduces the author's pursuit of demonstrating that Shakespeare's plays, often viewed solely through a literary lens, harbor a profound and systematic philosophy. Delia Bacon argues that this philosophy, which encompasses moral, political, and ethical dimensions, is intricately woven into the fabric of the plays. The preface, written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, emphasizes the author's dedication to revealing the complexities and secret narratives behind the writings of Shakespeare and others from that era. Bacon expresses that the Elizabethan context, dominated by political tension and a need for subtlety in expression, shaped the way these philosophical ideas were communicated, and this inquiry is set to unravel those hidden meanings and interconnections.
Edwin Durning-Lawrence
Bacon is Shake-Speare Together with a Reprint of Bacon's Promus of Formularies and Elegancies
"Bacon is Shake-Speare" by Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence is a non-fiction work written during the early 20th century that explores the controversial theory that the plays attributed to William Shakespeare were actually authored by Francis Bacon. This book delves into the intellectual capacity of Shakespeare’s works, arguing that the breadth of knowledge and sophistication displayed in the plays could not plausibly belong to an uneducated man from Stratford-upon-Avon. Instead, Durning-Lawrence posits that Francis Bacon, a learned scholar and writer, was the true mind behind the iconic plays. The opening of the work introduces the reader to the central inquiry regarding the true authorship of Shakespeare's plays. Durning-Lawrence critiques the traditional belief in Shakespeare as an unlettered man, suggesting that the richness of legal, historical, and classical knowledge embedded in the texts necessitates a more elevated author. He uses various references and pieces of evidence, including contemporary critiques, to challenge the commonly accepted image of Shakespeare. As he presents historical anecdotes and observations, the author sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the notion that Shakespeare’s literary genius might be better attributed to Bacon’s intellect, leading the reader to reconsider long-held assumptions about one of literature's most esteemed figures.
Albert Frederick Calvert
Bacon and Shakespeare
"Bacon and Shakespeare" by Albert Frederick Calvert is a historical account written in the early 20th century. The work explores the controversial debate surrounding the authorship of William Shakespeare's plays and whether they were actually written by Francis Bacon. The book aims to challenge the claims made by supporters of Baconian theories and to reaffirm Shakespeare's position as the true author of the plays. The opening of the book sets the stage for a detailed examination of the Bacon-Shakespeare authorship controversy. Calvert expresses his skepticism about Baconianism, suggesting that it is based on misunderstandings and misrepresentations of both figures. He indicates that the book will offer evidence and arguments against the notion that Bacon wrote Shakespeare's works, portraying Bacon's character and actions as unworthy of the authorship attributed to him. Through this initial exposition, Calvert intends to equip readers with a clearer understanding of the nuances involved in this literary debate, emphasizing the distinct qualities that characterize both Bacon and Shakespeare.
William Henry Burr
Bacon and Shakspere
"Bacon and Shakspere" by William Henry Burr is a critical examination of the authorship of William Shakespeare's works, written as a polemic in the late 19th century. This publication includes the central argument that Shakespeare was incapable of writing the plays and poetry attributed to him, positing instead that Francis Bacon was the true author. Burr’s book delves into the discrepancies in Shakespeare's signatures, the absence of any reliable likeness of him, and an analysis of the sonnets, alongside providing historical context to the Elizabethan era. In "Bacon and Shakspere," Burr meticulously scrutinizes various aspects of Shakespeare's life and work, ultimately claiming that the famous playwright was largely a front for Bacon's literary genius. He presents evidence such as the poor quality of Shakespeare's signatures, the lack of a definitive portrait of the playwright, and various legal documents to substantiate his argument that Shakespeare was illiterate. Additionally, Burr identifies Bacon as the “concealed poet Ignoto,” suggesting Bacon wrote not only the plays but also the sonnets falsely attributed to Shakespeare. The book asserts that Bacon’s eloquence and intellect are far superior, arguing that his profound literary output has been obscured by the popular mythology surrounding Shakespeare. Ultimately, Burr’s thesis challenges conventional literary history and invites readers to reconsider the authorship of literary masterpieces.
Edwin Durning-Lawrence
The Shakespeare Myth
"The Shakespeare Myth" by Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence is a critical examination of the traditional narrative surrounding William Shakespeare, written in the early 20th century. This book challenges the widely accepted authorship of Shakespeare's works, suggesting that they were actually penned by Francis Bacon, and delves into the historical and biographical inconsistencies pertaining to Shakespeare's life. It reflects the early 1900s cultural skepticism towards established literary canon and examines the implications of the authorship debate on the understanding of English literature. In this book, Durning-Lawrence meticulously dissects the evidence associated with Shakespeare, including his supposed signature, the publication of his plays, and the historical context of his life. He points out various discrepancies, such as the fact that only a handful of plays can be firmly attributed to Shakespeare during his lifetime, while many others emerged posthumously with significant alterations. Through an exploration of historical documents, scripts, and Bacon's own writings, he presents the argument that Shakespeare was not the prolific playwright and poet but rather a pseudonym used by Bacon to shield the true author from political and social scrutiny. The book is a unique contribution to literary criticism and raises profound questions about authorship, legacy, and the nature of literary genius.
E. W. (Edward Walter) Smithson
Baconian Essays
"Baconian Essays" by E. W. Smithson is a collection of essays written in the early 20th century. The book critically examines the authorship of the works attributed to William Shakespeare, presenting a case that argues Francis Bacon as the true author. This collection also includes contributions from notable figures like Sir George Greenwood, who adds his own essays and introduction to the discourse on literary identity. The beginning of "Baconian Essays" introduces the controversial debate surrounding the authenticity of Shakespeare's authorship, setting the stage for Smithson's arguments. It presents a range of perspectives, particularly highlighting the views of influential writers like Henry James, who questioned Shakespeare's legitimacy as the author of his celebrated works. Smithson challenges the conventional belief in the Stratford actor's authorship by proposing an alternative narrative that suggests literary deception was common in Shakespeare's time and that significant literary works were instead produced by Bacon under the guise of a pseudonym. This opening portion establishes an analytical tone that invites readers to reconsider widely held assumptions about one of literature's most iconic figures.
Kuno Fischer
Shakespeare und die Bacon-Mythen
"Shakespeare und die Bacon-Mythen" by Kuno Fischer is a scientific publication written in the late 19th century that delves into the contentious Bacon-Shakespeare authorship debate. The book examines the controversial theory that Francis Bacon, rather than William Shakespeare, was the true author of the renowned Shakespearean works. It seeks to demystify and debunk the myths surrounding this theory, engaging with various arguments put forth by its proponents while emphasizing the literary and historical significance of Shakespeare's own contributions. The opening of the work presents the context of Fischer's speech given at the German Shakespeare Society in Weimar, detailing his motivation to clarify misconceptions surrounding Shakespeare and the Bacon theory. He acknowledges the extensive literature that has accumulated on the subject, revealing how numerous advocates affirming Bacon's authorship have proliferated amidst their skeptics. Fischer sets the stage for his analysis by critiquing the rise of the so-called "Shakespeare myth" that paints Shakespeare as a mere crafted image without real literary merit, while simultaneously positioning Bacon as a concealed mastermind. The text introduces the overarching themes of the debate, including the lack of concrete evidence supporting the Bacon theory and the contrasting views of Shakespeare's artistic genius.
Recently surfaced classics